Appendix: Response to Wise's Comments
Par. 10.—Again Wise erroneously asserts that I associate polonium halos
only with granites. And to clarify terminology, I used the term "Precambrian
granites" to avoid any possible confusion with a variety of rocks that sometimes
are associated with crystalline granite. However, an integral part of my creation
model is that granites with polonium halos, of whatever presumed geological age,
are created granites. Thus, contrary to Wise's opinion, polonium halos in
these other granites do not at all invalidate my creation model.
Par. 11.—Wise recognizes that granite synthesis has not occurred because
he states, "And truly, an artificial granite has not yet been produced." Yet he
attempts to leave the impression that synthesis is soon to come by quoting various
geological reports relating to the synthesis of various single crystals of
minerals. The fact is, however, that single crystals of minerals are not pieces
of granite; granite, as I have used the term, is a coarse-grained mixture mainly
composed of feldspar, quartz, and biotite, and this has not been reproduced in a
hand-sized specimen. Thus Wise begs the question when he admits, "though a
true granite has not yet been produced in the laboratory, many granitic features
have been." At the very best, this is an overstatement because, first, biotite, one
of the primary mineral components of granite, has not been synthesized in
macroscopic-sized crystals. Secondly, whatever minerals have been synthesized in
the laboratory do [p. 332] not contain the polonium halos which are in natural granite, and
Wise ignores this tremendous disparity between laboratory synthesis of single
minerals and the actual occurrence of granite in nature. Wise is entitled to his
belief that a true granite may soon be synthesized in the laboratory, though such a
belief is inconsistent with the fact that, when a granite melt cools in the earth,
it recrystallizes to rhyolite, not granite.
Wise apparently feels that granite studies over the past few decades bear on the
crucial issue concerning polonium radiohalo evidence for creation. Do they? For
many years (Gentry, 1979) I have proposed that there is a test whereby it is possible
to determine whether the creation or evolutionary view of earth history is
correct. This falsification test enables the nonscientist to distinguish real facts
from what are simply deductions based on unproven uniformitarian assumptions.
Evolution's basic premise is that the earth geologically evolved to its present
state over billions of years by the action of known physical laws. A consequence of
this premise—technically known as the uniformitarian principle—is
that all the rocks now on or within the earth formed by natural processes. The
evolutionary scenario views granites—a widely distributed rock type that
contains polonium halos—as having formed countless thousands of times
during the course of earth history. If this is true, then it certainly should be
possible to synthesize a small, hand-sized piece of granite or a 10-cm-wide crystal of
biotite in a scientific laboratory. Thus, I have invited (Gentry, 1979, 1984, 1986)
my scientific colleagues who believe these rocks formed naturally to confirm
their view by experimental demonstration. But my nine-year-old invitation (Gentry, 1979)
for them to produce such specimens has produced only silence. This
is not surprising. The parentless polonium halos in these rocks provide unique
evidence that they did not form by natural processes.
Par. 12.—There are places where granites (or granodiorites) are surrounded
by metamorphosed, fossiliferous-bearing, sedimentary rock. But contrary to
Wise's view, such occurrences do not falsify my creation model. Conventional
uniformitarian geology teaches that granitic melts have intruded into
fossiliferous sedimentary rocks, thereby producing a metamorphic zone. But my
explanation of such metamorphism is quite different from that scenario and is
based on the previously mentioned fact that, when granite is melted in the earth
and subsequently cooled, it recrystallizes to form rhyolite, not granite. My
model for explaining metamorphosed, sedimentary rocks adjacent to
granites—such as those that occur in the Santa Rita mining district in southeastern
New Mexico—is as follows: Sometime during the Flood, movements within the
earth could have broken open an underground aqueous reservoir which
then contacted an intensely hot magma at considerable depth. That contact could
then have produced a superheated fluid loaded with volatile components
extracted from the magma. (In this scenario these volatile components would
subsequently become the mineralizing agents in producing the ore bodies.) This
superheated fluid would in turn have generated tremendous subterranean pressures.
Movements within the earth also would have fractured the heretofore
unbroken granodiorite basement rock. Once that happened, extremely high
pressure from both underground magma and the geothermal fluid would cause the
uplift of a huge section of the fractured granodiorite into the overlying
sediments. The magma referred to here would cool to form rhyolite and other secondary
rocks in the area, whereas the hot geothermal fluid is envisioned as the mineralizing
agent for both the uplifted granodiorite as well as the surrounding
sedimentary rocks. In such cases the metamorphic zone in the surrounding sedimentary
rocks would be produced by heat from the geothermal fluid rather than
from a cooling granitic melt.
Par. 13.—Again Wise maintains that granites surrounded by metamorphosed,
fossiliferous deposits would invalidate my view that granites are created
rocks. And he tacitly assumes the causative agent in producing such metamorphism
is heat from a cooling granitic melt, which is contrary to the experimental
evidence, namely, for the third time, that a granitic melt cools to form rhyolite,
not granite. In response to the previous paragraph I have outlined a scenario
whereby metamorphosed, sedimentary rocks can be produced around granites by hot
geothermal fluids at the time of granite uplift. Thus, such occurrences are
within the framework of my creation model.
|